SAE Standards

Aircraft Fuel Weight Penalty Due to Air Conditioning

Product Code: AIR1168/8
Date Published: 1989-09-01 - A newer version of this standard is available.
Date Reaffirmed: June 2004

Issuing Committee:

Ac-9 Aircraft Environmental Systems Committee

Scope

The purpose of this section is to provide methods and a set of convenient working charts to estimate penalty values in terms of take-off fuel weight for any given airplane mission. The curves are for a range of specific fuel consumption (SFC) and lift/drag ratio (L/D) compatible with the jet engines and supersonic aircraft currently being developed. A typical example showing use of the charts for an air conditioning system is given. Evaluation of the penalty imposed on aircraft performance characteristics by the installation of an air conditioning system is important for two reasons: 1) it provides a common denominator for comparing systems in the preliminary design stage, thus aiding in the choice of system to be used; and 2) it aids in pinpointing portions of existing systems where design improvements can be most readily achieved. All factors that influence the flight performance of an aircraft can be expressed in terms of weight, external and momentum drags, and changes in powerplant performance due to bleed air or shaft power extraction, or both. These factors lend themselves to numerical analysis, and the purpose of this chapter is to present and discuss methods that permit their evaluation. The methods of evaluating performance penalties to an aircraft in-flight employ such parameters as flight range, aircraft gross weight, fuel load, payload, speed-altitude characteristics and the effects of power, landing, and take-off field length limiting cases. Two major criteria need to be considered in arriving at system take-off weight penalties: 1) air vehicle weight is assumed fixed, and degradation in range occurs as a result of weight displacing fuel; and 2) range is assumed fixed, and the resultant take-off weight penalty is added to the total airplane weight. The later method will be discussed in this section, and is based in part, on Ref. 4. The former method (degradation in range) can be found, in detail, in Ref. 5. The optimization process consists of calculating specific penalty numbers for system fixed weight, variable weight, power consumption, ram air, and bleed air consumption, in terms of take-off weight and selecting the system that results in greater payload or range.

Product Status: In Stock

File Size: 1576K

Purchase more aerospace standards and aerospace material specifications and save! AeroPaks offers a customized subscription plan that lets you pay for just the documents that you need, when you need them. Learn more >

Current & Historical versions of this standard
Standard Date published ?Status
AIR1168/8A 2011-07-25 Stabilized
AIR1168/8 1989-09-01 Reaffirmed
To see your exact member discounted price, log in now.
Delivery
Method
List
Price
Member
Price*
Add to
Cart
Download $66.00 $52.80-$59.40
Add
Mail $66.00 $52.80-$59.40
Add
Fax $66.00 $59.40
Add

*The appropriate SAE Member discount will be applied through the Shopping Cart process. Discounts vary according to level of membership:
Elite Member 20%
Premium Member 15%
Classic Member 10%

Information on:
Download | Mail/Post | Fax
DRM Security | Copyright & Usage

Learn more about the Digital Rights Management Security available on all downloaded pdf documents.

If you are currently using this technical report and would like to provide feedback, please complete the SAE Standards User Feedback Form >

Related Content

  • Facebook
©2012 SAE International. All Rights Reserved.