Criteria

Text:
Content:
Display:

Results

Viewing 43231 to 43260 of 43413
HISTORICAL
1994-04-01
Standard
AMS4951F
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of welding wire.
HISTORICAL
1972-05-15
Standard
AMS4951C
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of wire for welding filler metal.
HISTORICAL
1977-01-15
Standard
AMS4951D
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of wire for welding filler metal.
HISTORICAL
1963-07-15
Standard
AMS4951A
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of wire for welding filler metal.
2017-04-26
WIP Standard
AMS4911P
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate up through 4.000 inches (101.60 mm) inclusive in thickness.
HISTORICAL
1968-05-01
Standard
AMS4951B
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of wire for welding filler metal.
HISTORICAL
2012-01-06
Standard
AMS4911M
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
HISTORICAL
1958-03-01
Standard
AMS4951
This specification covers one grade of commercially pure titanium in the form of wire for welding filler metal.
HISTORICAL
2007-02-27
Standard
AMS4911K
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
CURRENT
2014-03-07
Standard
AMS4911N
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate up through 4.000 inches (101.60 mm) inclusive in thickness (See 8.5).
HISTORICAL
2007-06-27
Standard
AMS4911L
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
HISTORICAL
1995-07-01
Standard
AMS4911H
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate procured in inch/pound units. MAM 4911 is the metric version of this AMS. These products have been used typically for parts requiring strength up to 750 degrees F, but usage is not limited to such applications. Certain processing procedures and service conditions may cause these products to become subject to stress-corrosion cracking; ARP 982 recommends practices to minimize such conditions.
HISTORICAL
2003-03-14
Standard
AMS4911J
This specification covers a titanium alloy in the form of sheet, strip, and plate procured in inch/pound units. These products have been used typically for parts requiring strength up to 750 degrees F, but usage is not limited to such applications. Certain processing procedures and service conditions may cause these products to become subject to stress-corrosion cracking; ARP 982 recommends practices to minimize such conditions.
HISTORICAL
2002-04-24
Standard
AS9101A
The purpose of this procedure is to define the content and the presentation of the Assessment Report. PLEASE NOTE: The downloadable version of this checklist features the ability to edit the form electronically. In order to save your changes, however, you will need to have either the full version of Adobe Acrobat (not just Acrobat Reader) or Adobe Approval. About the AS9100 Family of Standards This standard, AS9101A, is the checklist corresponding to AS9100A, issued in August 2001. AS9101, issued in September 2000, is the checklist corresponding to AS9100, issued in November 1999.
HISTORICAL
2000-09-01
Standard
AS9101
The purpose of this procedure is to define the content and the presentation of the Assessment Report. PLEASE NOTE: This downloadable version of the AS9101 checklist features the ability to edit the form electronically. In order to save your changes, however, you will need to have either the full version of Adobe Acrobat (not just Acrobat Reader) or Adobe Approval. About the AS9100 Family of Standards This standard, AS9101, is the checklist corresponding to AS9100, issued in November 1999. AS9101A, issued in April 2002, is the checklist corresponding to AS9100A, issued in August 2001.
CURRENT
2012-07-31
Standard
AS9003A
This standard includes selected quality system requirements from ISO 9001:2008[1] and AS9100:2009 applicable to noncomplex products and associated manufacturing processes. ISO 9001 text incorporated into this standard appears in standard font; while aviation, space, and defense industry additional requirements, definitions, and notes are presented in bold, italic text. The requirements of this standard are intended to be applied in whole, without any exclusions. Compliance with all corresponding AS9100 requirements is considered to meet/exceed compliance with the requirements of this standard. The requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to contractual and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Should there be a conflict between the requirements of this standard and applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, the latter shall take precedence. The process approach described in ISO 9001 and AS9100 applies to this standard.
CURRENT
2017-02-01
Standard
AS9115A
The requirements of 9100 apply with the following clarification for software. This standard supplements the 9100 standard requirements for deliverable software and contains quality management system requirements for organizations that design, develop, and/or produce deliverable software and services for the aviation, space, and defense industry. This includes, as required, support software that is used in the development and maintenance of deliverable software and services. The deliverable software may be stand-alone, embedded, mobile application, or loadable into a target computer. This deliverable software may also be part of services (e.g., cloud environment, web hosted solutions or platforms).
CURRENT
2016-03-29
Standard
AS9117
This standard specifies requirements for DPRV to establish common product/service requirements for use at all levels of the supply chain. This standard shall apply when an organization elects to delegate product release verification by contractual flow down to their supplier (reference 9100 and 9110 standards); to perform product acceptance on their behalf. The delegating organization shall use this standard as the baseline for establishing a DPRV process, although they may include additional contract requirements to meet their specific needs.
CURRENT
2016-10-31
Standard
AS9101F
This standard defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization's QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements. The requirements in this standard are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e., ISO/IEC 17000, ISO/IEC 17021-1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of the 9101 standard shall take precedence.
HISTORICAL
2010-04-27
Standard
AS9115
The requirements of 9100 apply with the following clarification for software. This document supplements the 9100 standard requirements for deliverable software and contains quality management system requirements for organizations that design, develop, and/or produce deliverable software for the aviation, space, and defense industry. This includes, as required, support software that is used in the development and maintenance of deliverable software. The deliverable software may be stand-alone, embedded, or loadable into a target computer. Where the use of Hardware Description Language (HDL) or high order language is utilized as the design source of electronic hardware [e.g., Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), Programmable Logic Device (PLD)], the organization and customer shall agree on the extent of applicability of this supplement. NOTE 1: For airborne electronic hardware guidance, see RTCA/DO-254 or EUROCAE ED-80; and for product realization requirements, see 9100.
HISTORICAL
2010-03-09
Standard
AS9101D
This standard defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. Additionally, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization’s quality management system documentation, and customer/regulatory requirements.
HISTORICAL
2014-03-01
Standard
AS9101E
This standard defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization's QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements. The requirements in this standard are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e., ISO/IEC 17000, ISO/IEC 17021). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of the 9101 standard shall take precedence. NOTE 1: In this standard, the term “9100-series standards” comprises the following Aerospace Quality Management System (AQMS) standards: 9100, 9110, and 9120; developed by the IAQG and published by various national standards bodies.
HISTORICAL
2003-03-17
Standard
AS9101B
Note: The electronic version of AS9101B is in Word format, enabling you to easily enter data into the checklist.
HISTORICAL
2006-07-31
Standard
AS9101C
The purpose of this document is to define the content and the presentation of the Assessment Report for the 9100 standard.
2014-10-22
WIP Standard
GEIASTD0009A
This standard requires the developers and customer/user's working as a team to plan and implement a reliability program that provides systems/products that satisfy the user's requirements and expectations. The user's requirements and needs are expressed in the form of the following four reliability objectives: The developer shall solicit, investigate, analyze, understand and agree to the user's requirements and product needs. The developer, working with the customer and user, shall include the activities necessary to ensure that the user's requirements and product needs are fully understood and defined, so that a comprehensive design specification and Reliability Program Plan can be generated; The developer shall use well-defined reliability- and systems-engineering processes to develop, design, and verify that the system/product meets the user's documented reliability requirements and needs.